Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3011 - 3015 of 4242

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Meleveettil Sankarankutty Nair @ Kuttan Nair et al vs Chinakka Parambil Chathappan et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 582/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-29

0 years, 7 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thufail et al vs Saidalavi et al regarding property ownership and injunction

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

Original Suit No. 348 of 2015

Tirur

2016-09-29

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Saju regarding Default Judgment

Execution Petition

EP 81/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-29

0 years, 7 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The secretary, Kalpakancheri Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Parambil Yahutty et al regarding payment execution

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 282/2015

Tirur

2016-11-29

1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Musthafa vs R. Muhammed Sha regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:149/2015

Tirur

2016-09-29

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,242 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 100 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1248

1248

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases often dismissed when plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence proving their claims or allegations.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Plaintiffs' non-appearance in court resulted in numerous dismissals for failure to represent their case.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Failure to Take required Steps

Various cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' inaction, such as not issuing necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?