Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2806 - 2810 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Sadique et al vs Ummachu et al regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Proceeding

EP 448/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-18

1 year, 6 months, 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed K. et al regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 131 OF 2014

Tirur

2014-06-13

Started 12-6-2014, Ended 13-6-2014

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs P.V. Abdul Nazar regarding license agreement and occupation

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages

Original Suit No. 6 OF 2014

Tirur

2016-11-23

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunhali vs Shaji Mon regarding undisclosed matter

Not mentioned

Original Suit No. 155/12 W OF 2014

Tirur

2014-06-12

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhippathumma-P1 et al vs Saidalavi regarding not pressed petition

Civil Suit - Order concerning not pressed petition

EP 11/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-12

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Petitioners frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner not appearing in court during hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Dismissing cases often involved the absence of required evidence to support claims or show respondent's means.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Action

Petitioners who did not take necessary actions, like issuing notices, faced dismissals for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Failure to Take Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?