Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2041 - 2045 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and finance Co.Pvt. Ltd and A.P Seetharaman regarding Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:79/2017

Tirur

2017-10-10

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Prajeesh Chettiyam thodi concerning loan satisfaction

Civil Execution Petition

EP 48/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-09

0 years, 7 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikod Co-Operative Bank et al vs Abdul Rasak regarding enforcement proceedings

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 158/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-09

0 years, 3 months, 2 days

Not available

View Full Details

Case between Hamsa vs Fathima regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:49/2017

Tirur

2017-10-09

2 years 4 months 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K.Sethumadhavan vs T.P.Biju regarding cheque amount recovery

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 20 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-10-07

3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish respondents' means to pay debts.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay the required batta or court fees.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs' absence in court or failure to have legal representation led to numerous case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary steps, like issuing notices, which resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?