Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2001 - 2005 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Ganesh Kandanchira regarding debt payment

Execution Petition

EP 67/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-24

0 years, 7 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Cholakka Pulikkapparambil Pokar vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Pokar @ Kunhimon regarding partition

Restoration Petition - Partition Suit

Restoration Petition 1143/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-23

1 year, 5 months, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Arshad P.P and Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. regarding money suit

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 265 OF 20 13

Tirur

2017-10-23

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muliyathil Beeyumma vs Muliyathil Pathummakutty regarding property delivery

Execution Proceedings

EP 87/2017

Malappuram

2017-10-23

0 years, 7 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Moideen vs P. Aboobacker regarding eviction

Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 36 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-23

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of sufficient evidence to support claims, especially regarding respondents' means to pay, resulted in dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary steps to issue required notices to respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed due to the absence of petitioners in court during proceedings, highlighting non-representation.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?