Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1856 - 1860 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Nasik regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

S.T. No:53/2017

Tirur

2017-12-06

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Pottengal Parangodan kutty's children et al vs Kummarambil Parangodan's children et al regarding Civil Procedure Code

Civil Suit - Application under Order 26 Rule 13 of CPC

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 628 OF 2008

Tirur

2017-12-15

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdurahiman vs Yasir et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 247 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-12-05

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.Balan vs Promod.P.T. regarding cheque dishonour for money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT No.212 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-12-04

2 years 8 months 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Sahakarana Bank vs Rajeshkumar Chittilapally regarding default judgment

Civil Suit

EP 44/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-04

0 years, 9 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support claims resulted in numerous dismissals across cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs often missed court appearances, prompting dismissals for lack of representation.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitioners frequently neglected to issue necessary notices to respondents, causing dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?