Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1821 - 1825 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Jimshida vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding gold business dispute

Original Petition (Pauper)

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No.112 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-12-14

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jameela vs Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.P 2266/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-14

0 years, 3 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Nazer vs Kadeeja et al regarding property partition

Civil Suit - Property Partition

Original Suit No. 22 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-12-14

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Khamarulaila et al vs Shajudheen et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 386 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-14

1 year, 11 months, 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parayil Kuttiyamu's children et al vs Parayil Ali et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 329 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-12-14

3 years

Plaintiffs

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff consistently failed to pay the necessary batta for proceedings, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence proving the means to pay or relevant claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices or representing in court.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear or participate in court proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?