Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1791 - 1795 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Shanavas et al vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. et al regarding rent arrears

Suit for realization of Money

Original Suit No. 521 OF 2013

Tirur

2017-12-21

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Catholic Syrian Bank vs Sanu M.V. et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 108/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

1 year, 9 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Riyasuddeen Poolakal regarding default inquiry

Civil Suit

EP 72/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

0 years, 9 months, 18 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Beekkutty et al vs Riyas et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 48 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Salam vs Basheer.C. regarding possession recovery

Civil Suit - Recovery of possession

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 369 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-12-20

1 year 11 months 30 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of evidence showing defendants' means often resulted in dismissal of petitions for lack of support.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Action

Plaintiffs who did not take necessary steps like issuing notices faced dismissals for default in their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Dismissing petitions due to absences of petitioners highlighted the significance of presence in legal proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Action

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?