Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1681 - 1685 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muhammed Haneefa Neduvancheri regarding default petition

Civil Suit - Default Petition

EP 69/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 10 months, 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Samsudeen Poniyeri regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 46/2017

Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 11 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Niramarathur Co-operative Bank et al vs Kaaliyadan Ummar et al regarding full amount received

Execution Proceeding

EP 181/2017

Tirur,Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 5 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mandayappurath Harifa vs Mandayapurath Ammeerali et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.172 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-29

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Safiya et al vs Asya et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2859 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-01-31

6 years 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

The petition was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required court fees.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence supporting their claims or proving financial means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear in court when required.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often neglected to take necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?