Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1546 - 1550 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Suhara et al vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding Fixation of Boundary, Mandatory Injunction, and Recovery of Possession

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 42 OF 2014

2018-03-17

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Valavanur Service Co-Operative Bank vs Iyyathutty regarding default judgment

Civil Suit - Default Judgment

EP 195/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-17

0 years, 7 months, 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Khairunneesa vs Muhammed et al regarding property rights

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 323 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-16

2 years 11 months 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sainaba vs Kunhahammed et al regarding return of advance money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 371 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-16

2 years 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hamza et al vs Junais Rehman.K regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 386 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-16

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove the means or claims of the respondents led to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Default in Taking Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner’s absence during hearings, indicating lack of participation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default in Taking Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?