| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14041 - 14045 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Secretary vs Saju regarding Default Judgment

Execution Petition

EP 81/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-29

0 years, 7 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The secretary, Kalpakancheri Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Parambil Yahutty et al regarding payment execution

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 282/2015

Tirur

2016-11-29

1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Musthafa vs R. Muhammed Sha regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:149/2015

Tirur

2016-09-29

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aboobacker vs Sulaikha and Muhammad Kutty et al regarding property delivery under order 21 Rule 35

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 27 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-09-28

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Co-Operative Bank vs Sundaran et al regarding debt execution

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 78 of 2016

Tirur

2016-09-28

Less than 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submission

Failure to provide sufficient evidence to support claims or demonstrate means resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear in court as required.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Inability to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, led to numerous dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submission

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?