Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1266 - 1270 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between C. Hussain vs Sayyid Faisal Shihab regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:42/2016

Perinthalmanna

2018-10-25

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C. Hussain and Sayyid Faisal Shihab regarding dishonour of a negotiable instrument

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:94/2017

Perinthalmanna

2018-10-25

3 years 1 day

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sainudheen et al vs Hareesh et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:32/2018

Tirur

2018-10-25

6 months 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sainudheen vs Shareefa et al regarding recovery of possession

Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession

ORIGINAL SUIT No.119 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-10-24

4 years

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Mohanan. P.V et al vs Sreelakha. C P et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of N.I. Act)

S.T. No:18/2018

Tirur

2018-10-24

1 year 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the necessary batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence at hearings or failure to represent themselves.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals often occurred due to insufficient evidence to support claims regarding financial means of respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Default for Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs failed to issue necessary notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff or Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default for Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?