| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12526 - 12530 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed Kassim et al vs Thunchan Memorial College et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 380 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-31

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kamalbasha et al vs Yoosaf et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 388 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-31

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muhammed Parappaara regarding debt repayment

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 60/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-31

1 year, 0 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nalakath Pareeth vs Thaivalappil Nazer regarding full satisfaction recorded

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 146/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-31

2 years, 9 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Grameen Bank vs Hussain T.K alias Hassan regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 167/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-31

0 years, 8 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

18%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees to proceed in their cases, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioners not appearing in court for their hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Cases

Dismissing patterns showed that plaintiffs did not make necessary procedural steps, resulting in case closures.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Absence of Petitioners

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Cases

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?