| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12226 - 12230 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Shareef Kanakkanakath et al regarding decree closure

Execution Proceedings

EP 141/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-12

0 years, 5 months, 3 days

Not mentioned

View Full Details

Case between Koyakutty vs Hareesh regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:23/2018

Tirur

2018-12-12

4 years (refiled from 2014)

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bharathi Auto Finance et al vs E.. Velayudhan et al regarding loan repayment

Execution Proceedings

EP 40/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-07

0 years, 10 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yogakesham Loans Limited vs Beevi regarding loan repayment

Civil Suit

EP 106/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-07

1 year, 7 months, 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Ali Modappayil regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 128/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-12-07

0 years, 5 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary batta fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many plaintiffs were unable to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Numerous cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps in a timely manner.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Several cases resulted in dismissals due to the absence of the plaintiffs during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?