Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1146 - 1150 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between P vs Gopalan Choppan veettil regarding Decree

EP/40/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-12-11

0 years 10 months 9 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Cholakkal Saifullah et al vs The Direct of Human Resource Development for Electronics et al regarding Petition filed for under section 11(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control )Act.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 44 OF 2017

TIRUR

2019-12-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hasseena vs M.E. S College of Engineering regarding Decree Holder vs Judgment Debtor

Unknown

EP 285/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-09

1 years 0 months 4 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Usmankutty vs Moideenkunhu alias Mullakkoya regarding Decree

Unknown

EP 139/2014

2019-12-07

5 years 5 months 25 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, By its Manager vs Lakshmikutty Amma et al regarding Suit for realisation of money

Unknown

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 78 OF 2019

2019-12-06

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of sufficient evidence to support claims, especially regarding respondents' means to pay, resulted in dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary steps to issue required notices to respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed due to the absence of petitioners in court during proceedings, highlighting non-representation.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?