Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 171 - 175 of 328

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Muhammed Kutty, Haji et al vs Regional Agro Industrial Development Co-operative of Kerala, Ltd et al regarding eviction

Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 68 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-06-06

2 years 11 months 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Chamakkunnil Kari Muhammed Faisal vs Noushad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.52 OF 2016

2017-02-28

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Saidalavi vs Binu.M.K regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 81 OF 2015

TIRUR

2017-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aminakutty et al vs Alikutty @ Babu regarding eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.53 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-27

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Tharammal Suseela vs M.K. Hussain et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 59 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-02-27

1 year 2 months 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 328 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Commission Plan (in 24 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 224
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43.48%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court or lacked representation, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (43.48%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed as petitioners chose not to press their claims during hearings.

Found in 21 cases (30.43%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs often could not substantiate their claims, resulting in dismissal of suits.

Found in 9 cases (13.04%) Medium Impact

Jurisdiction Issues

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction over the claims presented.

Found in 6 cases (8.7%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Claims

Jurisdiction Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?