Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 141 - 145 of 328

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Moidutty Haji vs Sudheesh regarding rent arrears and vacant possession

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction, Damages, Recovery of Rent

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 61 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-09-25

13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Rafi et al vs Baiju regarding rent and damages

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.39 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-09-22

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A. Mammikutty vs Government of India regarding eviction for dental clinic setup

Rent Control - Eviction Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 36 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-09-18

2 years 5 months 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hallalath et al vs Muhammed Shefeekh et al regarding eviction for arrears of rent

Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 74 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-09-16

1 year 10 months 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Latha vs Bindu regarding Property Delivery

Execution Proceedings

Execution Petition 141/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-31

0 years, 2 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 328 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Commission Plan (in 24 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 224
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37.68%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Numerous cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs being absent or lacking legal representation during the hearing.

Found in 26 cases (37.68%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Several petitions were dismissed as the counsel for the plaintiff opted not to pursue the case or didn't press the petition.

Found in 19 cases (27.54%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence or Grounds

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence or grounds leading to the dismissal of their claims.

Found in 9 cases (13.04%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Lack of Steps

Cases were dismissed due to a lack of action taken by the plaintiffs or their counsel, resulting in a default.

Found in 8 cases (11.59%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Insufficient Evidence or Grounds

Default Due to Lack of Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?