Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 106 - 110 of 328

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Moideen et al vs Marakkar regarding eviction for hotel business

Petition u/s 11(3) of Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 34 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-02-27

21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty's children et al vs Mangodi Shajahan regarding eviction

Civil Matter - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 35 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-02-27

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty's children et al vs Valliyengal Sidheek regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 36 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-02-27

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thankamani T.V et al vs Subrahmanian et al regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 204/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-26

1 year, 5 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Latheef et al vs Indus Motors Company, Private Ltd regarding eviction for commercial purpose

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 35 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-02-27

1 year 7 months 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 328 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Commission Plan (in 24 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 224
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37.68%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Numerous cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs being absent or lacking legal representation during the hearing.

Found in 26 cases (37.68%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Several petitions were dismissed as the counsel for the plaintiff opted not to pursue the case or didn't press the petition.

Found in 19 cases (27.54%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence or Grounds

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence or grounds leading to the dismissal of their claims.

Found in 9 cases (13.04%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Lack of Steps

Cases were dismissed due to a lack of action taken by the plaintiffs or their counsel, resulting in a default.

Found in 8 cases (11.59%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Insufficient Evidence or Grounds

Default Due to Lack of Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?