Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 81 - 85 of 328

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Abdul Khadar et al vs Entheen kutty regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 42 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-06-22

1 year 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Machinchery Abdu vs Abdul Rasheed et al regarding eviction

Civil Suit - Eviction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 327 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-06-12

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim et al vs Jasvanth Kumar regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 92 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-06-11

1 year 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kandath Moideen Haji's children et al vs Abdul Vahid et al regarding eviction and super market setup

Civil - Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 40 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-06-11

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thattakrakandiyil Prabhakaran vs Girija, Nishad and Balan regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 241/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-06-07

0 years, 6 months, 21 days

Decree holder

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 328 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Commission Plan (in 24 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 224
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33.33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

The plaintiff frequently failed to appear or lacked legal representation during hearings.

Found in 23 cases (33.33%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Counsel for the plaintiff often chose not to press the petition, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (26.09%) High Impact

Default Dismissals for Various Reasons

Many cases were dismissed due to procedural defaults, including lack of steps from the plaintiffs.

Found in 14 cases (20.29%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Ownership or Claims

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence for ownership or claims related to eviction.

Found in 11 cases (15.94%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Default Dismissals for Various Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership or Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?