Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 61 - 65 of 327

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammad Haji vs Kadavath Muhammad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 62 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-10-27

4 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Kalathil Parambil Enthen's daughter et al vs Sasidharan regarding rented premises dispute

Petition under Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 30 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-10-26

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty et al vs Thiruvangattu Parambu Sukumaran regarding eviction

Civil Petition - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 26 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-10-10

1 year 11 months 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty et al vs Aramughan regarding property alteration

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 27 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-10-10

1 year 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammedkutty vs Subaida regarding Eviction

Civil Suit - Eviction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 64 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-09-29

2 years 3 months 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 327 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 39 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)
Reply Notice (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 223
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43.48%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to their own absence during hearings, leading to defaults.

Found in 30 cases (43.48%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs or their counsel chose not to press the petitions.

Found in 21 cases (30.43%) High Impact

Lack of Documentary Evidence

In several instances, plaintiffs failed to provide essential documents to support their claims.

Found in 8 cases (11.59%) Medium Impact

Jurisdiction Issues

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction over the claims presented.

Found in 5 cases (7.25%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Lack of Documentary Evidence

Jurisdiction Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?