Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 56 - 60 of 327

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammed Haji et al vs Kadavath Muhammed regarding settlement

Civil Suit - Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 33 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-11-17

Not mentioned

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sakkariya vs Abdullakkutty regarding rent arrears and eviction

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 32 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-31

Approximately 2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

68%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 327 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 39 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 28 cases)
Postal receipt (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 23 cases)
Reply Notice (in 23 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 223
Defendant Won: 69

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43.48%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to their own absence during hearings, leading to defaults.

Found in 30 cases (43.48%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs or their counsel chose not to press the petitions.

Found in 21 cases (30.43%) High Impact

Lack of Documentary Evidence

In several instances, plaintiffs failed to provide essential documents to support their claims.

Found in 8 cases (11.59%) Medium Impact

Jurisdiction Issues

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction over the claims presented.

Found in 5 cases (7.25%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Lack of Documentary Evidence

Jurisdiction Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?