Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 331 - 335 of 673

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Valappil Pokknhiyakath Ayinikkal Parambil Kunhi Pocker's son: Sainudheen vs Karuvattil Mohamed Rasheed regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

Original Suit No. 136 of 2016

Tirur

2016-12-21

1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Panayankandi Mohan Das vs Accomplish Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding gold business transaction

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 360 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-22

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yahutty vs Abdurahiman @ Kunhippa regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

Original Suit No. 372 OF 2014

Tirur

2016-12-21

2 years 11 months 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhimohamed vs Abdul Razak regarding loan realisation

Civil Suit - Debt Realisation

Original Suit No. 257 OF 2014

Tirur

2016-12-19

2 years 4 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company Ltd regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

Original Suit No. 254 of 2016

Tirur

2016-12-09

1 month and 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 673 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 29 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 21 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 478
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or costs, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Several cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during critical hearings, limiting their opportunity to present evidence.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Proving Means

Plaintiffs failed to provide necessary evidence demonstrating the defendant's ability to pay, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's inability to produce required documentation to support their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Proving Means

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?