Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 266 - 270 of 673

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Vikraman et al regarding loan repayment

Execution Proceeding - Loan Repayment

EP 270/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-05

1 year, 9 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 63/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years 3 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Declaration

EP/66/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years, 3 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Vettem Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Abdurahiman regarding payment dispute

Civil Suit - Payment Dispute

EP 366/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

1 year, 8 months, 7 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 56/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-02

0 years, 3 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 673 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 29 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 21 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 478
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaints were dismissed primarily for the failure to pay necessary court fees or batta fees for proceedings.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Absence and Lack of Representation

Cases where plaintiffs were absent during hearings or failed to send representatives led to dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

The lack of evidence showing defendants' means to pay debts resulted in the dismissal of petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Plaintiffs' counsel not pressing the suits resulted in dismissals in several cases.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence and Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?