Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 216 - 220 of 673

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Somasundaran Asarivalappil regarding Loan satisfaction

Civil Suit

EP 73/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-25

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Kavilakath Mohanan regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 28/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-23

0 years 6 months 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd et al vs Nayikara Rajeev regarding debt payment

Civil Case - Debt Payment

EP 30/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-23

0 years, 6 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Yoonas regarding loan repayment

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 46 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-08-21

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sudhakaran, V.P. vs Afsal Babu regarding loan repayment dispute

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

Original Suit No. 69 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-08-21

Approximately 1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 673 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 29 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 21 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 478
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitions dismissed for failure to pay necessary fees, resulting in default judgments.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Multiple cases dismissed when the plaintiff failed to attend court hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred due to the inability to provide sufficient evidence to support claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Plaintiff Not Pressing the Suit

Cases dismissed when the plaintiff or their counsel did not actively pursue the claim.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff Not Pressing the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?