Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 171 - 175 of 673

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Suresh Babu regarding payment of debt

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 378/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-03

2 years, 0 months, 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Co. Ltd. vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding unidentified Judgment debtors

Civil Suit

EP 151/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-31

1 year, 4 months, 18 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Jaisal et al vs. Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding non-repayment of pledged gold ornaments

Civil Suit - Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 105 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yogakshema Sabha et al vs Nelson et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Realization of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 159 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year 8 months 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary, P. Ramkumar vs Hameed et al regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 159/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-28

2 years 4 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 673 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 29 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 21 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 478
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press Charges

Numerous cases were dismissed because the plaintiff did not actively pursue their case.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Press Charges

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?