Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.12 OF 2018

Case between Abdul Nazer vs Ameer Babu regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Nazer seeks eviction of Ameer Babu from a property due to rent arrears and damages caused to the building. Various claims made by both parties regarding the usage and utility of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petition granted for eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondent from the property within 2 months
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Court found evidence of rent arrears and damages caused by the respondent, supporting the plaintiff's claim for eviction.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 as follows: a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 2 months from today. b) The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Nazer (39 years years) Cheriyath Quarters, Kattachira Road, Near Viswas Theatre, Thalakkad amsom desom, PO. B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Ameer Babu (40 years years) Eranhikkal House, Thalakkad amsom desom, PO. B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 2 months from today
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
To realize the costs of the petition from the respondent
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commissioner report submitted as evidence by the petitioner
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commission plan submitted as evidence by the petitioner
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases