Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION Nos. 81 OF 2016

Case between Erachampatt Raseena et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction

Court
RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-29
Duration
3 years 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves petitioner seeking eviction of respondent for own business purposes. Respondent contests eviction, arguing suitability of current location for his business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner's eviction petition granted due to genuine need for own business purposes.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of shop rooms
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The genuine need for conducting their proposed business by the petitioner and her husband.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Erachampatt Raseena (38 years) Mankuzhiyil House, Veluyamcode North. PIN - 679579, Ponnani Taluk

Defendants

M.Sreenivasan (58 years) Machalil House, Thalakkad amsom Mangattiri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner granted eviction of shop rooms bearing No. 25/132 and 25/140 from respondents
Evidence:
Court ruling on the petition under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Petitioner entitled to realize the costs of the petition from respondents
Evidence:
Court ruling on the petition under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Assessment Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence by petitioner's witness PW1
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice dated 28-12-2015
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence by petitioner's witness PW1
Reference:
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Assessment Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence by petitioner's witness PW1
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Copy of Profit an Loss Account of the business
Submitted By: Respondent
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence by respondent's witness RW1
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Copy of Dealer Partitculars
Submitted By: Respondent
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence by respondent's witness RW1
Reference:
B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner Smt.Pratheeksha.K
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner Smt.Pratheeksha.K
Reference:
C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner Smt.Ramya.C.T.
Reference:
C3
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner Smt.Ramya.C.T.
Reference:
C4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 08/27/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases