Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 5 OF 2019

Case between Muhammed Haji et al vs Alachampatt Abdul Kareem et al regarding Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves petitioners requiring shop rooms from respondents to start their own business, citing non-payment of rent and diminishment of property value by the respondents. Court granted eviction order to petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Court granted an eviction order to the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Haji (62 years) Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103 Alavi Haji (59 years) Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103 Moideen Haji (56 years) Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103

Defendants

Alachampatt Abdul Kareem (59 years) Tirur amsom, Pookkayil desom, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk, 676 107 Abdu Rahiman (53 years) Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction for the respondent to vacate the petition schedule building within three months
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under Sections 11 (3), 11 (4) (ii) and 11 (4) (v) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to realize the costs of the petition from the respondent
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realize the costs of the petition from the respondent

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence adduced by the petitioners and unchallenged by the respondent
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence adduced by the petitioners and unchallenged by the respondent
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
60%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases