Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 OF 2018

Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Noufal regarding money transaction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance suing Noufal for repayment of borrowed amount with interest. Defendant failed to repay despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff is awarded Rs. 2,45,400 with 18% interest. Defendant is also ordered to pay court costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Money Recovery Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance (Not mentioned years) Door No.26/1751, 204, 1st Floor, Nusrath Complex, Naduvilangadi, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur amsom, desom and Taluk

Defendants

Noufal (Not mentioned years) Thennala amsom, Appla desom, PO. Venniyur, Tirurangadi Taluk, PIN 676 508

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff to pay ₹ 2,45,400/- with interest @ 18% per annum to plaintiff
Evidence:
Defendant borrowed ₹ 2,40,000/- from plaintiff firm. Remitted ₹ 64,000/-. Issued cheque. Cheque returned unpaid. Plaintiff issued notice. Defendant remained ex parte.
Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize costs of suit from defendant
Evidence:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of suit from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant remitted ₹ 64,000/- to the loan account. Issued to discharge remaining liability.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque was returned as unpaid for 'Fund Insufficient'.
Reference:
Document Type: Lawyer Notice Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff issued notice to defendant demanding payment covered by cheque.
Reference:
Document Type: Unserved Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant evaded service of notice.
Reference:
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant signed and executed a Promissory Note for ₹ 2,40,000/- on 31.07.2017.
Reference:
A5

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Financial Institution

Similar Cases