Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 87 OF 2016

Case between Kainikkara Muhammedkutty vs Hamza et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN, B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
Order Date
2019-11-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by Kainikkara Muhammedkutty under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 to evict tenants for bonafide need of building. Respondents deny landlord claims and subletting accusations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petition granted for eviction due to bonafide need of landlord.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of defendants from the building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner provided cogent and reliable evidence unchallenged by absent respondents.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act to evict defendants and recover costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kainikkara Muhammedkutty (63 Years years) Trikkandiyur amsom, Kumaramangalam desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Hamza (66 Years years) Elanattil House, Pazhamkulangara, Tirur amsom, Kott desom, PO. Tirur, Tirur Taluk, 676 101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of building granted to petitioner
Evidence:
Respondents directed to give vacant possession within three months
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order vacated on deposit of arrears of rent within one month
Evidence:
Order under S. 11 (2) (b) shall be vacated on deposit of arrears of rent within one month
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent
Evidence:
Petitioner entitled to realize the costs of the petition from the respondent

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued to respondents demanding surrender of building
Reference:
Exbt.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for lawyer notice sent to respondents
Reference:
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card for lawyer notice sent to respondents
Reference:
Document Type: Unserved Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unserved letter to respondents
Reference:
Exbt.A2
Document Type: Unserved Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unserved letter to respondents
Reference:
Exbt.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report from Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Exbt.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch filed by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Exbt.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases