Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 76 OF 2016

Case between Hallalath vs Ramesh regarding eviction petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-12
Duration
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by Hallalath to evict Ramesh from shop rooms due to non-payment of rent and bonafide need for own business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner granted eviction order due to non-payment of rent and bonafide need for own business.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of shop rooms within three months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner proved bonafide need and non-payment of rent.

Judgment Evidence:

The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner within three months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Hallalath (40 Years years) Kuttippuram amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Saidalavi (42 Years years) S/o. Viruthulliyil Beeran, Kuttippuram amsom, desom, PO. Kuttippuram, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Ramesh (51 Years years) Kuttippuram amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk. 679 571

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordered respondent to vacate the building within three months
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled for an order of eviction under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of ownership of the shop rooms
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment of taxes
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of possession of the rooms
Reference:
Document Type: Residence Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting documentation
Reference:
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding vacant possession
Reference:
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reference:
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization document
Reference:
Document Type: Order in RCP.74/2016
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant legal order
Reference:
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
TIRUR
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases