Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2016

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K
Order Date
2018-11-02
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner, represented by Erachampattu Haneefa, filed a petition under section 5 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, section 5 was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim (46 years) Erachampattu House, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk Erachampattu Haneefa (44 years) Erachampattu House, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk, PIN 676107

Defendants

Sujatha Sreenivasan (40 years) Machalil House, Thalakkad amsom Mangattiri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN 676105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not pressed
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases