Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 27 OF 2017

Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty et al vs Aramughan regarding property alteration

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. NIMMI.K.K
Order Date
2018-10-10
Duration
1 year 17 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition to evict respondent from a property due to unauthorized alterations diminishing its value and utility, enabling petitioners' family to start a new business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property within 2 months and pay all costs to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the property and costs awarded to petitioner
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of this order under 11(3) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control )Act 1965. II. The respondent is directed to pay the entire costs of the petition to the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kuttiyil Pathummakutty (83 years) Mangala veettil, Pookkayil Bazar.P.O., Thrikkandiyur amsom Kumaramangalam desom, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Farooq (60 years) Mangala veettil, Pookkayil Bazar.P.O., Tirur Taluk, Thrikkandiyur amsom Kumaramangalam desom

Defendants

Aramughan (50 years) Residing at Tirur amsom Thumarakkavu desom, P.O.Pookkayi Bazar, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the property granted to the petitioner
Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of this order under 11(3) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control )Act 1965.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs awarded to the petitioner
Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. II. The respondent is directed to pay the entire costs of the petition to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submission of lawyer notice to the respondent
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of postal receipt submission
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt
Reference:
A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 09/29/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases