Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 163 OF 2015

Case between Ayisha et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2018-07-13
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dispute over partition where the plaintiff and defendants were not present or represented resulting in dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiffs nor defendants were present or represented.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. Plaintiff not present, not represented. Defendants not present, not represented. Posted for plaintiff's evidence. Hence suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13th day of July, 2018). MUNSIFF.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ayisha (55 years) Koorkkaparambu, Naduvattom.P.O., Pattambi, Palakkad Dist.

Defendants

Moideenkutty (52 years) Athavanadu amsom desom, Tirur Taluk Muhammed (49 years) Mammi (47 years) Fathima (45 years) Vettichira, Chungam Khamarunneesa (28 years) P.O. Thozhvanhoor

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Dispute over partition resulting in suit dismissal for default
Evidence:
Suit for partition. Plaintiff not present, not represented. Defendants not present, not represented. Posted for plaintiff's evidence. Hence suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13th day of July, 2018). MUNSIFF.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 07/13/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
98%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases