Case Summary
Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim filed a rent control petition against Jasvanth Kumar under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, but the petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and power of attorney.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition dismissed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner absent. Power of Attorney absent. IA 1391/18 dismissed. Hence petition is dismissed in default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 11th day of June, 2018) RENT CONTROLLER.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Erachampatt Muhammed Kasim (46 years)
Erachampatt House, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, 676 107, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Jasvanth Kumar (50 years)
Privaj Electric Works, 25/137, Thazhepalam, Tanur Road, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, 676 107, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Rent Control petition dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed due to absence of the petitioner and power of attorney
Evidence:
Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act. Petitioner absent. Power of Attorney absent. IA 1391/18 dismissed. Hence petition is dismissed in default.