Case Summary
The petitioners, represented by Kandath, sought eviction of the respondent from a room due to rent arrears and to start a supermarket for livelihood.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession of the property
Case Type
Civil - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Kandath Moideen Haji's children (Age not specified years)
...
Defendants
Abdul Vahid (45 years)
S/o Kizhakkamkunnath, Muhammed Basheer, Tirur amsom Kott desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order for immediate eviction of the respondent and vacant possession of the property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used against the respondent for non-payment of rent and eviction claim.
Reference:
A1 - Copy of Registered Lawyer Notice dated 15-7-2017