Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 343 OF 2016

Case between Sakkeena vs Saidalavi regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-07
Duration
1 year 192 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Sakkeena filed a suit seeking injunction against defendant Saidalavi, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sakkeena (43 years) Chalakkaparambil House, Thalakkad amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Saidalavi (65 years) Kizhakkepattu House, Pulinchodu, Mannnarad, Thalakkad amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendant
Evidence:
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 06/07/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases