Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 90 OF 2014

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2018-06-07
Duration
Approximately 4 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji filed a suit against multiple defendants seeking boundary fixation and injunction. However, the suit was dismissed as the plaintiff and defendant representatives were absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation and no representation on behalf of the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissing the suit for boundary fixation and injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Exparte order passed against D2 is hereby set aside. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji (64 years) Palachiramad, P.O.Edarikode. PIN - 676 501

Defendants

Pathumma (67 years) Omachapuzha amsom & Post Karinkapara desom Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 320 Muhammed (47 years) Pathumma (45 years) Nafeesa (43 years) Safiya (41 years) Saidalavi (39 years) Ibrahim (36 years) Aathikka (32 years) Arba (30 years) Abdul Hakkeem (28 years) Ummul Khayar (24 years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Boundary Fixation
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking boundary fixation
Evidence:
No representation from the plaintiff and defendants' representatives were absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
No representation from the plaintiff and defendants' representatives were absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 06/07/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases