Case Summary
Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji filed a suit against multiple defendants seeking boundary fixation and injunction. However, the suit was dismissed as the plaintiff and defendant representatives were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissing the suit for boundary fixation and injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Exparte order passed against D2 is hereby set aside. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji (64 years)
Palachiramad, P.O.Edarikode. PIN - 676 501
Defendants
Pathumma (67 years)
Omachapuzha amsom & Post Karinkapara desom Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 320
Muhammed (47 years)
Pathumma (45 years)
Nafeesa (43 years)
Safiya (41 years)
Saidalavi (39 years)
Ibrahim (36 years)
Aathikka (32 years)
Arba (30 years)
Abdul Hakkeem (28 years)
Ummul Khayar (24 years)
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking boundary fixation
Evidence:
No representation from the plaintiff and defendants' representatives were absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
No representation from the plaintiff and defendants' representatives were absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.