Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2013

Case between Suhara vs Fathima et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-04
Duration
5 years 5 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Suhara filed a suit for injunction against defendants Fathima and K.P.Kareem. However, the suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and had no legal representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of legal representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The counsel for plaintiff submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Suhara (45 Years years) Kurumbathur amsom, Punnathala desom, Punnathala.PO.

Defendants

Fathima (44 Years years) Chekidapurath House, Chunkam, Kurumbathur amsom, Punnathala desom. K.P.Kareem (49 Years years) Karinkapara House, Kurumbathur amsom, Punnathala desom and Post.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction relief.
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 06/01/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases