Case Summary
Ramla, the plaintiff, sought injunction against Divakaran and others to prevent reducing the width of the way or obstructing the use of a specific pathway.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Compromise IA. 782/2018 is filed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful is decreed as follows. The defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from reducing the width of the way or from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in the use of Plaint "B" schedule way.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Ramla (32 years)
Post Alathiyoor, pin: 676 102, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Divakaran (60 years)
Kadengal House, Triprangode amsom, desom & post Alingal, Pin: 676 102, Tirur Taluk
Karatt Kadavath Pattayil Muhammed Shafi (45 years)
Alathiyoor amsom and Post, Thandillakkara desom, Pin: 676 102
Vinod (36 years)
"Sreelakam" Valparambil Puthan veettil, Muthuthala amsom, Melmuri desom & Post, Koppam Village, Ottappalam Taluk, Pin: 679 307
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained from reducing the width of pathway or obstructing plaintiff's use of schedule way.
Evidence:
Compromise IA. 782/2018 is filed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful is decreed as follows. The defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from reducing the width of the way or from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in the use of Plaint "B" schedule way.