Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 34 OF 2017

Case between Moideen et al vs Marakkar regarding eviction for hotel business

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-27
Duration
21 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners seek eviction of respondent from a rented room to start a hotel business citing bonafide need after working abroad for 30 years.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and ordered the respondent to vacate the property within a month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and costs
Case Type
Petition u/s 11(3) of Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners' need for the property to start a hotel business to be bonafide and unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty's children (Age not specified years) Iringavoor amsom, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Pottatharayil Marakkar (66 years) Tirur amsom, Kott desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule property
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the petition to be paid by the respondent
Evidence:
The respondent shall pay costs of the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 02/06/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases