Case Summary
Petitioners filed a case seeking eviction of the respondent from a room under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act due to bonafide need to start a supermarket.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession of the building
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction and Bonafide Need
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved bonafide need for the room to start a supermarket, and the respondent failed to rebut the evidence.
The petitioner proved bonafide need for the room to start a supermarket, and the respondent failed to rebut the evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) and 11(4)(v) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows: The respondent is directed to put the petitioners in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within one month from today. The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondents.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mecheri Aboobacker (59 years)
Tirur amsom, Thumarakkavu desom, Tirur Taluk
Safiya (52 years)
Tirur amsom, Thumarakkavu desom, Tirur Taluk
Ansas (31 years)
Tirur amsom, Thumarakkavu desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Thirunilath Gangadharan (65 years)
Tirur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction and vacant possession of the building
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Supported the petitioner's case
Reference:
C1 - 22-3-2016 - Commission report submitted by Smt.Anjana.N.P. Advocate Commissioner
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
NA
Reference:
C2 - NA