Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 388 OF 2014

Case between Ruksana vs Hamza et al regarding fraud and misrepresentation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-19
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ruksana filed a suit for injunction against Hamza and others, alleging fraud and misrepresentation in property transaction agreements.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed Ruksana's suit for injunction due to failure to prove fraud and misrepresentation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Insufficient proof of fraud and misrepresentation.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ruksana (29 years) Kooriyadan House, Puthoor amsom desom, P.O. Puthoor - 676 503, Tirurangadi Taluk

Defendants

Hamza (43 years) Thottiyil House, Parappoor amsom desom, P.O. Parappoor - 676 503, Tirurangadi Taluk Abdul Majeed (43 years) Alangadan House, Kottakkal amsom desom. P.O. Kottakkal - 676 503, Tirur Taluk Shahul Hameed (34 years) Mannarkkundil House, Puthoor amsom Cherukunnu desom, P.O. Othukkungal, 676 528, Tirurangadi Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Cancellation of sale deeds and recovery of possession
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Theeradharam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy exhibited as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Theeradharam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy exhibited as evidence
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Exhibited as evidence
Reference:
B7
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Exhibited as evidence
Reference:
B8(c)

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases