Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
FDA 628/2008

Case between Karappan et al vs Appu et al regarding Representation Absent

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-12-15
Duration
9 years, 8 months, 28 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed a case against respondents for representation negligence by their absence in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Interlocutory Application (IA) due to the absence of petitioners with imposed costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Interlocutory Application (IA) dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioners not turn up. The name of petitioner called absent. No representation. Hence IA dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Karappan (0 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Velayudhan (38 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Gopaolan (34 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Yasoda (46 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Sumathi (32 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Bindu (29 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Kunhamma (74 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Ganeshan (26 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Ravi (24 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Ratheesh (19 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Sabu (17 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Raju (16 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Remya (13 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Devaki (49 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk

Defendants

Appu (0 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Velu (61 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Peranthan (58 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Kumaran (49 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Achakutty (64 years) Perumanna Amsom and Post, Klari Desom, Tirur taluk Unnooli (0 years) Ponmala Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Velu (69 years) Ponmala Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Peranthan (59 years) Ponmala Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Rajan Vettikkadan (0 years) Melmuri Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Prabhakaran Vettikkadan (0 years) Melmuri Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Venugopalan (0 years) Vettikkadan House, Melmuri Amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Ambika V.K (0 years) Pallathu House, Post Chettiparambu East, Kodur, Ponmala amsom, Desom, Ernad Taluk Bindu.V.K (0 years) Thuvvakkadan House, Mudekkode, Pazhamallur Amsom and Post, Ernad Taluk Sobhana.V.K (0 years) Padammal House, Kuruva, Pazhamallur Post, Ernad Taluk Shylaja.V.K (0 years) Chavarengal House, Mankada Pallippuram Amsom, Desom, Padinhattummuri, Perinthalmanna Sheeja.V.K (0 years) Kuruvalapalliyali House, Mundupuramba Post, Malappuram Amsom and Deso

Reliefs

Relief Type: Interlocutory Application (IA)
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petitioners not turning up resulting in dismissal of IA with costs
Evidence:
It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioners not turn up. The name of petitioner called absent. No representation. Hence IA dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/24/2008 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases