Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 151 OF 2014

Case between Kolankara Rajagopalapanikkar vs Balamani Amma et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-24
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed suit seeking partition of property claiming inheritance rights from father as per partition deed executed in 1980, defendants contested denial of plaintiff's ownership and profit share.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the partition of item No. 2 property into 21 equal shares among parties based on evidence presented by plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of item No. 2 property into 21 equal shares
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found plaintiff's claim for share of property valid based on evidence and inheritance rights.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The plaint B schedule item No. 2 shall be divided into 21 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kolankara Rajagopalapanikkar (72 years) Neduva amsom, desom, Post Parappanangadi, Putharikkal, Tirurangadi Taluk

Defendants

Balamani Amma (75 years) Vettampallipram amsom, desom, Post Chemravattom, Tirur Taluk Manoj (42 years) Vettampallipram amsom, desom, Post Chemravattom, Tirur Taluk Vinod Kumar (38 years) Vettampallipram amsom, desom, Post Chemravattom, Tirur Taluk Sunil Kumar (36 years) Vettampallipram amsom, desom, Post Chemravattom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of item No. 2 property into 21 equal shares
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The plaint B schedule item No. 2 shall be divided into 21 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Based claim for ownership and inheritance rights
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting release of shares in property
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Mentioned in defense against plaintiff's claim
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner regarding property details
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner detailing property layout
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 10/24/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases