Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 82 OF 2014

Case between Alachambatt Bava Haji vs Edayath Hamza et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-21
Duration
3 years and 6 months
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff seeks perpetual injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction of a way to access his property purchased in Tirur.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing his access to the property via the way.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his exclusive ownership and possession of the way and demonstrated that the defendants had no right to obstruct his access.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants and their men are restrained by a perpetual injunction from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff in using the plaint B schedule way for his entry with vehicular access to plaint 'A' schedule item No.1. 2. The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Alachambatt Bava Haji (60 years) Tirur amsom desom, Pookkayil Bazar Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Edayath Hamza (45 years) Tanaluoor amsom, Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk Chalakkaparambil Fahad (30 years) Tanaluoor amsom, Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk Chalakkaparambil Faisal (25 years) Tanaluoor amsom, Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk Naduvil Kooriyil Manikandan (45 years) Tanaluoor amsom, Meenadathur desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained defendants from obstructing plaintiff's access via the way
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants and their men are restrained by a perpetual injunction from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff in using the plaint B schedule way for his entry with vehicular access to plaint 'A' schedule item No.1. 2. The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved exclusive ownership and possession of the plaint A schedule property
Reference:
No.488/97
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant for the case
Reference:
22-01-2014
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant
Reference:
dated;18-1-2008
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reported specific details about the property
Reference:
13-03-2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases