Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 144 OF 2013

Case between Sulthan vs Arshad regarding partition of property

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-28
Duration
Approximately 5 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Sulthan filed a suit seeking partition of a property that is currently in joint possession with the defendant Arshad, based on the plaintiff's purchase of the property and the defendant's alleged sale of the property to another individual.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property into two equal shares, with each party entitled to one share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to substantiate the claim of the property being sold to another individual, while the plaintiff's evidence and documents proved ownership and joint possession.

Judgment Evidence:

The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property into two equal shares, with each party entitled to one share.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sulthan (24 years) Mulakkaparambil House, Purathoor desom, P.O. Purathoor

Defendants

Arshad (48 years) Pazhayaputhan veettil House, P.O. Vakkad, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom, Tirur Taluk, PIN 676 502

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of the property into two equal shares
Evidence:
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property into two equal shares, with each party entitled to one share.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ownership document showing acquisition of the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipts for the property in the years 2011 and 2012
Reference:
A2(a), A2(b), A2(c)
Document Type: Building Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipts issued by the Grama Panchayath
Reference:
A3(a), A3(b)
Document Type: Not available
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Not mentioned in the judgment
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 03/28/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases