Case Summary
Plaintiff filed suit against defendant for recovery of possession, but the matter was settled between the parties through a compromise petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Agreement for property purchase
Case Type
Recovery of Possession Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recorded a lawful compromise agreement between the parties regarding the purchase of the property, and the terms were incorporated into the decree.
The court recorded a lawful compromise agreement between the parties regarding the purchase of the property, and the terms were incorporated into the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
The terms of the compromise are lawful, and since the terms are recorded as part of the decree, the suit is dismissed according to the terms of the compromise.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Katheeja Umma (48 years)
Kunnasseri Karuvattil House, Ponmundam amsom, Chilavil desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Aliyamu (49 years)
Kunnasseri Karuvattil House, Ponmundam amsom, Chilavil desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Agreement for property purchase
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant to purchase property from plaintiff as per specific terms
Evidence:
The terms of the compromise are lawful, and since the terms are recorded as part of the decree, the suit is dismissed according to the terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise petition
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the terms of the compromise settled between the parties.
Reference:
IA. 1890/2017
Document Type:
Compromise petition
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Documented the terms of the compromise settled between the parties.
Reference:
IA. 1890/2017