Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
EXECUTION PETITION NO. 68 OF 2016

Case between D. Soosan vs Vijayan regarding execution of award

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-08-03
Duration
8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks execution of award passed for non-payment of debt, while respondent denies having sufficient means to repay.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered arrest and detention of the respondent in the civil prison for non-payment of the decree debt
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Arrest and detention in civil prison
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided evidence that the respondent had sufficient means to pay the debt but neglected to do so.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Issue arrest warrant against the respondent.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

D. Soosan (45 years) Pallatt House, Thirunnavaya amsom, Codakkal desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Vijayan (49 years) Kottikashalathara House, Puthupalli amsom, Thrithala desom, Post Puthupalli, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution Order
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Arrest and detention of the respondent in the civil prison
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Issue arrest warrant against the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Joint statement.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of jenm assignment Deed No. 373/2008.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance certificate.
Reference:
A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 12/04/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases