Case Summary
Plaintiff filed suit seeking fixation of boundary between A, B, C schedule properties after a dispute arose over constructing a compound wall. First defendant agreed to fix the boundary following a mediation and commissioner's report.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Boundary fixation as per Ext.C4 plan
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Commissioner accurately measured the property and showed the boundary of A & C schedule, in line with document No.2773/2003.
Commissioner accurately measured the property and showed the boundary of A & C schedule, in line with document No.2773/2003.
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Makkutty @ Kunhutty (63 years)
Triprangode amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Vattaparambil Kunhikitta @ Appukkuttan's Children (Not mentioned years)
Triprangod amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Panhan @ Kuttan (63 years)
Triprangod amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Vilasini @ Kunhammu (51 years)
Triprangod amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
To fix boundary between A & C schedule properties as per Ext.C4 plan
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proving share of A schedule property to the plaintiff
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting ownership of A schedule property
Reference:
A2(a)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report on the property measurement
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Plan of the property
Reference:
C2