Case Summary
Petitioners, Mannil Kunhalan Haji's Children and Kunhipathumma, sought possession of a room due to rent arrears and bonafide need for starting a business. Respondent Payyanatt Damodaran remained ex-parte.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the room and costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner's case credible as the respondent remained ex-parte, and there was no challenge to the evidence presented.
The court found the petitioner's case credible as the respondent remained ex-parte, and there was no challenge to the evidence presented.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mannil Kunhalan Haji's Children (Age not specified years)
Omachapuzha amsom, Perincheri desom, Tirur Taluk
Kunhipathumma (71 years)
Omachapuzha amsom, Perincheri desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Payyanatt Damodaran (Age not specified years)
Niramaruthoor amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioners granted possession of the room and costs
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the respondent regarding the case
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledging delivery of notice
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Received as proof of notice delivery
Reference:
Ext.A1(c)
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the respondent to the notice
Reference:
Ext.A2